The «emulate» call isn't sufficient, since these lines are parsed before
it takes effect.
Fixes#689 (née #622).
See also #688 for preventing these gymnastics from being needed in the
first place.
See also https://github.com/junegunn/fzf/pull/1924 for an inter-plugin
interaction that this probably fixes.
ZSH versions less than 5.3.2 (or 5.4) have a bug that prevents
`history-incremental-pattern-search-backward` for working
correctly (the history stops searching after the first found item).
Closes#407
This updates the docs and the driver, in a manner backwards compatible with
existing highlighters. (None of the highlighters are touched by this change,
yet tests continue to pass.)
Part of issue #329.
This patch causes a behaviour difference in the [i257] scenario:
- Before this change, the zle_highlight[isearch] is applied and z-sy-h's
highlighting isn't.
- With this change, both zle_highlight[isearch] and z-sy-h's
highlighting are applied, so «echo foo» renders the first word in green
underline (fg=green from ZSH_HIGHLIGHT_STYLES[builtin], underline from
zle_highlight[isearch]).
This patch causes the presuppositional FAQ entry added in
a8fe22d422 to be correct.
This is part of #261, of which #288 was a spin-off.
[i257] https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-syntax-highlighting/pull/257#issuecomment-168394665
zsh version 5.2 and lower don't support ISEARCHMATCH_ACTIVE and
we are unable to re-apply zle_highlight on top. Therefore it is
impossible to see the underlined matched area.
Since that information is more important, completely disable
highlighting in isearch in that case.
To do that, we need to make sure we are actually called when
something changes in isearch.
Trumps #257.
The FAQ entry presupposes #245 will be fixed (in time for the release) too.
Special handling for cursor imprint or partial path highlighting
is needed in more cases than accept-*. For example when accepting
a line from isearch, no accept-* widget is invoked.
The proper way is to use zle-line-finish.
Trumps #259.
Fixes#284.
Merge remote-tracking branch 'danielshahaf/i267-linewise-region-v1'
* danielsh/i267-linewise-region-v1:
tests: Add a regression test for issue #267, concerning highlighting a vi linewise region.
Support linewise region.
Instead, use the %N prompt expando, as suggested by Bart in users/21637.
Avoid the `print -P %N` syntax to save a fork on Cygwin, at the expense
of not supporting zsh's from 2001 through c. 2004 vintages.
Fixes#338.
