add a workaround for an off-by-one bug in ZSH that triggers when PROMPT overflows a line

This commit is contained in:
romkatv 2019-05-29 09:21:02 +02:00
parent 58545efa01
commit 01320275d2

View file

@ -411,10 +411,11 @@ function _p9k_left_prompt_end_line() {
_P9K_PROMPT+="\${_P9K_T[\$_P9K_N]}" _P9K_PROMPT+="\${_P9K_T[\$_P9K_N]}"
_P9K_PROMPT+="%f$1%f%k%b" _P9K_PROMPT+="%f$1%f%k%b"
(( ! _P9K_RPROMPT_DONE )) || return 0 if (( ! _P9K_RPROMPT_DONE )); then
_P9K_PROMPT+=$_P9K_ALIGNED_RPROMPT _P9K_PROMPT+=$_P9K_ALIGNED_RPROMPT
_P9K_RPROMPT_DONE=1 _P9K_RPROMPT_DONE=1
(( ${ZLE_RPROMPT_INDENT:-1} > 0 )) return 1
fi
} }
################################################################ ################################################################
@ -2317,6 +2318,23 @@ _p9k_init_timer() {
fi fi
} }
# Does ZSH have a certain off-by-one bug that triggers when PROMPT overflows to a new line?
#
# Bug: https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh/commit/d8d9fee137a5aa2cf9bf8314b06895bfc2a05518.
# ZSH_PATCHLEVEL=zsh-5.4.2-159-gd8d9fee13. Released in 5.5.
#
# Fix: https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh/commit/64d13738357c9b9c212adbe17f271716abbcf6ea.
# ZSH_PATCHLEVEL=zsh-5.7.1-50-g64d137383.
#
# Test: PROMPT="${(pl:$((COLUMNS))::-:)}<%1(l.%2(l.FAIL.PASS).FAIL)> " zsh -dfis <<<exit
# Workaround: PROMPT="${(pl:$((COLUMNS))::-:)}%{%G%}<%1(l.%2(l.FAIL.PASS).FAIL)> " zsh -dfis <<<exit
function _p9k_prompt_overflow_bug() {
is-at-least 5.4.2 || return 1
[[ $ZSH_PATCHLEVEL =~ '^zsh-5\.4\.2-([0-9]+)-' ]] && return $(( match[1] < 159 ))
is-at-least 5.7.2 && return 1
[[ $ZSH_PATCHLEVEL =~ '^zsh-5\.7\.1-([0-9]+)-' ]] && return $(( match[1] >= 50 ))
}
# Some people write POWERLEVEL9K_DIR_PATH_SEPARATOR='\uNNNN' instead of # Some people write POWERLEVEL9K_DIR_PATH_SEPARATOR='\uNNNN' instead of
# POWERLEVEL9K_DIR_PATH_SEPARATOR=$'\uNNNN'. There is no good reason for it and if we were # POWERLEVEL9K_DIR_PATH_SEPARATOR=$'\uNNNN'. There is no good reason for it and if we were
# starting from scratch we wouldn't perform automatic conversion from the former to the latter. # starting from scratch we wouldn't perform automatic conversion from the former to the latter.
@ -2426,6 +2444,8 @@ _p9k_init() {
_p9k_init_timer _p9k_init_timer
fi fi
_p9k_prompt_overflow_bug && local glitch='%{%G%}' || local glitch=''
_P9K_ALIGNED_RPROMPT='${${:-${_P9K_X::=0}${_P9K_Y::=$((COLUMNS+1))}' _P9K_ALIGNED_RPROMPT='${${:-${_P9K_X::=0}${_P9K_Y::=$((COLUMNS+1))}'
repeat 10; do repeat 10; do
_P9K_ALIGNED_RPROMPT+='${_P9K_M::=$(((_P9K_X+_P9K_Y)/2))}' _P9K_ALIGNED_RPROMPT+='${_P9K_M::=$(((_P9K_X+_P9K_Y)/2))}'
@ -2442,7 +2462,8 @@ _p9k_init() {
repeat 32; do repeat 32; do
_P9K_ALIGNED_RPROMPT+='%-$_P9K_X(l. .)' _P9K_ALIGNED_RPROMPT+='%-$_P9K_X(l. .)'
done done
_P9K_ALIGNED_RPROMPT+=' $_P9K_RPROMPT' _P9K_ALIGNED_RPROMPT+=' $_P9K_RPROMPT${(pl.${${ZLE_RPROMPT_INDENT:-1}/#-*/0}.. .)}'
_P9K_ALIGNED_RPROMPT+=$glitch
if [[ $POWERLEVEL9K_PROMPT_ADD_NEWLINE == true ]]; then if [[ $POWERLEVEL9K_PROMPT_ADD_NEWLINE == true ]]; then
repeat ${POWERLEVEL9K_PROMPT_ADD_NEWLINE_COUNT:-1} _P9K_LEFT_PREFIX+=$'\n' repeat ${POWERLEVEL9K_PROMPT_ADD_NEWLINE_COUNT:-1} _P9K_LEFT_PREFIX+=$'\n'
@ -2465,6 +2486,7 @@ _p9k_init() {
local pad_len="\$((COLUMNS-$ruler_len))" local pad_len="\$((COLUMNS-$ruler_len))"
_P9K_LEFT_PREFIX+="%b\${(pl$sep$ruler_len$sep$sep${(q)ruler_char}$sep)}%k%f" _P9K_LEFT_PREFIX+="%b\${(pl$sep$ruler_len$sep$sep${(q)ruler_char}$sep)}%k%f"
_P9K_LEFT_PREFIX+="\${(l$sep$pad_len$sep$sep $sep)}" _P9K_LEFT_PREFIX+="\${(l$sep$pad_len$sep$sep $sep)}"
_P9K_LEFT_PREFIX+=$glitch
else else
print -P "%F{red}WARNING!%f %BPOWERLEVEL9K_RULER_CHAR%b is not one character long. Ruler won't be rendered." print -P "%F{red}WARNING!%f %BPOWERLEVEL9K_RULER_CHAR%b is not one character long. Ruler won't be rendered."
print -P "Either change the value of %BPOWERLEVEL9K_RULER_CHAR%b or set %BPOWERLEVEL9K_SHOW_RULER=false%b to" print -P "Either change the value of %BPOWERLEVEL9K_RULER_CHAR%b or set %BPOWERLEVEL9K_SHOW_RULER=false%b to"