fontforge has an undocumented call to set the fsSelection bits.
Never rely on documentation :-(
Found this here:
https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/3174
And the readback values are actually not read from the source font, so
we do not use them.
Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
[why]
Under certain circumstances the WWS names (Family and Subfamily) are
used to identify a font. We do not touch these SFNT table entries, so
when the font is renamed these are wrong (have the original name).
Font-grouping will go wrong then.
[how]
The typographic ('Preferred') Family and Styles are set correctly
already and they follow the WWS pattern, so the WWS fields can be (and
should) be empty. They exist to allow font grouping in the case where
the typographic names do not follow that pattern.
Remove preexisting WWS entries (because they are not needed anymore,
otherwise we would need to write the corrected new names there).
We already set the WWS bit in fsSelection that is needed:
def fs_selection(self, fs):
"""Modify a given fsSelection value for current name, bits 0, 5, 6, 8, 9 touched"""
[...]
b |= WWS # We assert this by our naming process
return b
Unfortunately we have no way (jet) to set fsSelection.
This is only the case for Iosevka for all fonts in src/unpatched-fonts.
Reported-by: Rui Ming (Max) Xiong <xsrvmy>
Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
DO NOT MERGE
[why]
A lot of the fonts have incorrect naming after patching. A completely
different approach can help to come up with a consistent naming scheme.
[how]
See bin/scripts/name-parser/README.md
Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
