[why]
Codicons is completely missing...
[how]
After creating a stub file for Codicons, use _their_ definition file:
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/vscode-codicons/main/dist/codicon.csv
cat codicon.csv | tail -n +2 | sort -k 3 -t ',' | sed -E "s/([^,]*),([^,]*),(.*)/i='\2' i_cod_\1=\$i/" | tr '-' '_' >> i_cod.sh
Because they have new additional icons remove some lines in the bottom.
And add the final `unset i`.
I still have not figured out how the cheat sheet works and how we get
the data into that... There is a `generate-css.sh`. Hmm.
Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
[why]
Lilex is missing from the 2.2.0 RC and is not automagically patched.
[how]
Add Lilex to the font metadata database :->
[note]
Lilex's licence has no RFN given.
Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
[why]
Before Font Logos 1.0.0 there was no stable-codepoint guarantee, and the
later revisions (0.18) reassigned the codepoints. That makes updating
for us very hard, because we would have to resort the icons or follow
the codepoint changes.
With 1.0.0 this changed. That new major release introduced not only a
codepoint guarantee, but it also shifted the codepoints from the F100
region to the F300 region, where we put them anyhow (in most cases).
That is one subset less with 'dynamic base codepoint'.
The reassignment of codepoints in Font Logos kept the codepoints stable
for the icons we already have in release 2.1.0. But at the moment the
2.2.0 Release Candidate (which updated Font Logos with commit 557b8da)
have added glyphs, which are on different points as compared with the
Font Logos 1.0.0 release.
What I want to say, we need to get this straight, before our 2.2.0 RC
turns into a Release 2.2.0.
Signed-off-by: Fini Jastrow <ulf.fini.jastrow@desy.de>
